Seismic performance of bridges to a spatially varying horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motion

Document Type : Research Article


1 Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran


Considering the spatial variations of ground motions in the design of extended structures, especially bridges, is of importance. In this paper, the effect of spatial variations of the ground motions on bridges regarding the horizontal and vertical components of the earthquake was investigated. A five spans bridge is modeled in OpenSees and 3D nonlinear dynamic time history analysis is performed. The generation of acceleration time histories is in accordance to the spectral-representation-based simulation algorithm which has been presented in previous studies. Seismic performance of the bridge was studied by considering the identical and differential support ground motions. Shear force, bending moment, displacement of bridge piers in identical and differential excitation supports with different soil conditions were analyzed. The results showed that by considering the spatial variations of ground motions, internal forces made significant changes at the piers of the bridge. Based on the results by assuming the spatial variation of ground motion, bridge responses in piers will grow considerably; the axial, shear force and bending moment in the bridge piers calculated 1.87، 1.8, 1.97 times, respectively, compared to the identical support ground motion. Furthermore, the influence of soil type of the construction site has been investigated. The results illustrated that the non-homogeneous sites lead to the increase in axial force about 55% in the bridge piers.


Main Subjects

[1] bridges under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal earthquake motions, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 20(6) (1991) 535-549.
[2]    M.R. Button, C.J. Cronin, R.L. Mayes, Effect of vertical motions on seismic response of highway bridges, Journal of structural engineering, 128(12) (2002) 1551-1564.
[3]    S.J. Kim, C.J. Holub, A.S. Elnashai, Experimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motion, Engineering Structures, 33(7) (2011) 2221-2235.
[4]    B. Li, N. Chouw, Experimental investigation of inelastic bridge response under spatially varying excitations with pounding, Engineering Structures, 79 (2014) 106-116.
[5]    B. Shrestha, H. Hao, K. Bi, Seismic response analysis of multiple-frame bridges with unseating restrainers considering ground motion spatial variation and SSI, Advances in Structural Engineering, 18(6) (2015) 873- 891.
[6]    J. Zhong, J.-S. Jeon, W. Yuan, R. DesRoches, Impact of spatial variability parameters on seismic fragilities of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to differential support motions, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22(6) (2017) 04017013.
[7]    L.-X. He, B. Shrestha, H. Hao, K.-M. Bi, W.-X. Ren, Experimental and three-dimensional finite element method studies on pounding responses of bridge structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions, Advances in Structural Engineering, 20(1) (2017) 105-124.
[8]    A.G. Özcebe, C. Smerzini, V. Bhanu, Insights into the effect of spatial variability of recorded earthquake ground motion on the response of a bridge structure, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, (2018) 1-27.
[9]    M. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi, A. Zerva, Simplified Displacement Loading Patterns for Incorporation of Spatially Variable Ground Motions in Bridge Seismic Design Codes, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22(6) (2017) 04017010.
[10] S. Adanur, A.C. Altunisik, K. Soyluk, A. Bayraktar, A. Dumanoglu, Stationary and transient responses of suspension bridges to spatially varying ground motions including site response effect, Advanced Steel Construction, 13(4) (2017) 378-398.
[11] G. Deodatis, Non-stationary stochastic vector processes: seismic ground motion applications, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 11(3) (1996) 149-167.
[12] P. Code, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance- part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, (2005).
[13] M. Shinozuka, V. Saxena, G. Deodatis, Effect of spatial variation of ground motion on highway structures, (2000).
[14] S.-H. Kim, M.Q. Feng, Fragility analysis of bridges under ground motion with spatial variation, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 38(5) (2003) 705-721.
[15] M. Shinozuka, Stochastic fields and their digital simulation, in: Stochastic methods in structural dynamics, Springer, 1987, pp. 93-133.
[16] M. Shinozuka, G. Deodatis, Stochastic process models for earthquake ground motion, Probabilistic engineering mechanics, 3(3) (1988) 114- 123.
[17] Y. Li, A. Kareem, Simulation of multivariate nonstationary random processes by FFT, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(5) (1991) 1037-1058.
[18] P. Cacciola, G. Deodatis, A method for generating fully non-stationary and spectrum-compatible ground motion vector processes, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(3) (2011) 351-360.
[19] N. Abrahamson, Spatial variation of multiple support inputs, in: Proc of 1st US Seminar on Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Steel Bridges, 1993.
[20] P.C. Jennings, G.W. Housner, N.C. Tsai, Simulated earthquake motions, (1968).
[21] G. Zanardo, H. Hao, C. Modena, Seismic response of multi‐span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 31(6) (2002) 1325-1345.