Stress-Strain Relationship for Nanosilica-Incorporated Lightweight Aggregate Concrete under Compressive Monotonic and Cyclic Loading

Document Type : Research Article


Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran


Compared with normal-weight concrete, lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC) has a lower compressive strength. However, its plus points, including preferable fire resistance, appropriate durability, and dead-load decline lead to the LWAC’s application in the construction industry. A practical method to overcome its drawback could be adding nano-silica (NS) to the mixes. For this purpose, the current experimental work aimed at researching to explore the compressive response of LWAC containing different dosages of nano-silica. Therefore, cylindrical specimens of size 150 × 300 mm improved by nano-silica were subjected to compressive cyclic and monotonic loading; six dosages of NS, including 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weight percent of cement were added to mixes as cement replacement. Experimental stress-strain curves were investigated to determine the stress-strain relationships. The results show that the addition of up to 3 wt % nano-silica improves the properties of LWAC, as it was found to enhance compressive strength and modulus of elasticity during monotonic loading, shift up the common point coordinate, and reduce the stiffness degradation of the reloading paths in cyclic loading. However, larger dosages of nano-silica (4% and 5%) were found to have diminishing returns, considering the improved properties of LWAC. Furthermore, stress-strain models for the nano-silica-incorporated LWAC were proposed in compression. The experimental findings were also compared with the proposed model. There was an acceptable concurrence between the proposed model data and experimental findings.


Main Subjects

[1] B. Sinha, K. H. Gerstle, L. G. Tulin, Stress-strain relations for concrete under cyclic loading, in:  Journal Proceedings, (1964) 195-212.
[2] I.D. Karsan, J. O. Jirsa, Behavior of concrete under compressive loadings, Journal of the Structural Division, (1969).
[3] B. Y. Bahn, C. T. T. Hsu, Stress-strain behavior of concrete under cyclic loading, ACI Materials Journal, 95 (1998) 178-193.
[4] D. Z. Yankelevsky, H. W. Reinhardt, Model for cyclic compressive behavior of concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, 113(2) (1987) 228-240.
[5] D. Palermo, F. J. Vecchio, Compression field modeling of reinforced concrete subjected to reversed loading: formulation, Structural Journal, 100(5) (2003) 616-625.
[6] W. Ramberg, W. R. Osgood, Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters, (1943).
[7] Z. Rong, W. Sun, H. Xiao, G. Jiang, Effects of nano-SiO2 particles on the mechanical and microstructural properties of ultra-high performance cementitious composites, Cement and Concrete Composites, 56 (2015) 25-31.
[8] S. Kawashima, P. Hou, D. J. Corr, S. P. Shah, Modification of cement-based materials with nanoparticles, Cement and Concrete Composites, 36 (2013) 8-15.
[9] L. Singh, D. Ali, U. Sharma, Studies on optimization of silica nanoparticles dosage in cementitious system, Cement and Concrete Composites, 70 (2016) 60-68.
[10] J. Xu, B. Wang, J. Zuo, Modification effects of nanosilica on the interfacial transition zone in concrete: A multiscale approach, Cement and Concrete Composites, 81 (2017) 1-10.
[11] Y. Gao, C. Zou, Experimental study on segregation resistance of nanoSiO2 fly ash lightweight aggregate concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 93 (2015) 64-69.
[12] H. Du, D. Suhuan, L. Xuemei, Effect of nano-silica on the mechanical and transport properties of lightweight concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 82 (2015) 114-122.
[13] A. Standard, ASTM C330, Standard Specification for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete, ASTM International, (2014).
[14] J. R. Prestera, M. Boyle, D. A. Crocker, S.B. Chairman, E.A. Abdun-Nur, S.G. Barton, L.W. Bell, G.R. Berg, S.J. Blas Jr, P.M. Carrasquillo, Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Structural Lightweight Concrete (ACI 211.2-98), (1998).
[15] A. Standard, ASTM C469, Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression, ASTM International, (2010).
[16] A. Standard, ASTM C39, Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, ASTM International, (2012).
[17] J.J. Thomas, H.M. Jennings, J.J. Chen, Influence of nucleation seeding on the hydration mechanisms of tricalcium silicate and cement, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 113(11) (2009) 4327-4334.
[18] G. Land, D. Stephan, The influence of nano-silica on the hydration of ordinary Portland cement, Journal of Materials Science, 47(2) (2012) 1011-1017.
[19] R. Yu, P. Spiesz, H. Brouwers, Effect of nano-silica on the hydration and microstructure development of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with a low binder amount, Construction and Building Materials, 65 (2014) 140-150.
[20] M. H. Zhang, O.E. Gjvorv, Mechanical properties of high-strength lightweight concrete, Materials Journal, 88(3) (1991) 240-247.
[21] G. M. Sturman, S.P. Shah, G. Winter, Microcracking and inelastic behavior of concrete, Special Publication, 12 (1965) 473-499.
[22] S. Sinaie, A. Heidarpour, X.-L. Zhao, J.G. Sanjayan, Effect of size on the response of cylindrical concrete samples under cyclic loading, Construction and Building Materials, 84 (2015) 399-408.
[23] D. J. Carreira, K.-H. Chu, Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression, in:  Journal Proceedings, (1985) 797-804.
[24] S. Popovics, A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete, Cement and concrete research, 3(5) (1973) 583-599.