Cyclic Behavior of Variously Drilled Flange Beam Connected to Box Column

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

2 Center of Excellence for Engineering and Management of Civil Infrastructures School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The moment frame system is used as a lateral load resisting system against seismic loads. So far, a large body of research has been conducted on steel connections and various types of connections including Reduced Beam Section (RBS) and Drilled Flange Connection (DFC). Using RBS results in the formation of inelastic deformation in a part of the beam far from the column flange. They have studied the seismic performance of the recently developed DFC as a simple and efficient alternative to mostly used conventional RBS. In this research, the beam flange is drilled in different patterns in terms of the hole diameter. After simulating the models in Abaqus, the moment-rotation curves are extracted and analyzed numerically. Having obtained the results of the current research regarding the moment connection where beam flanges are drilled, it is evident that drilling holes in the beam flange with a clock pattern can better satisfy the flexibility expectations. Moreover, this pattern has the higher capability for plastic hinge transfer from the column face compared to the direct pattern. Additionally, this pattern can reduce the bending stress in the penetration weld of the direct beam to column connection. Thus, the clock pattern of beam flange holes performs better than the straight one.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]. G. Pachideh, M. Gholhaki, A.S. Daryan, Analyzing the damage index of steel plate shear walls using pushover analysis, in:  Structures, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 437-451.
[2]. Maleki, R.A. Jazany, M.S. Ghobadi, Seismic fragility assessment of SMRFs with drilled flange connections using ground motion variability, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(4) (2019) 1733-1746.Engineering, Vol.23, No.4, pp.1733-46.
[3].  A. Karimian, A. Armaghani, A. Behravesh, Performance of Low-yield Strength Plates in Beam-column Connections against Progressive Collapse, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(1) (2019) 335-345.
[4]. M. Gholhaki, G. Pachideh, Investigating of damage indexes results due to presence of shear wall in building with various stories and spans, Int J Rev Life Sci, 5(1) (2015) 992-997.
[5]. A. Atashzaban, I. Hajirasouliha, R.A. Jazany, M. Izadinia, Optimum drilled flange moment resisting connections for seismic regions, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 112 (2015) 325-338.
[6]. S. Kazerani, N. Fanaie, S. Soroushnia, Seismic behavior of drilled beam section in moment connections, Journal of Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 1(4) (2017) 1-6.
[7]. A.A. Hedayat, H. Saffari, M. Mousavi, Behavior of steel reduced beam web (RBW) connections with arch-shape cut, Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(10) (2013) 1645-1662.
[8]. M. Vetr, A. Haddad, Study of drilled flange connection in moment resisting frames, in:  Report No. 3732, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Tehran; Iran, 2010.
[9]. H. Farrokhi, F. Danesh, S. Eshghi, A modified moment resisting connection for ductile steel frames (Numerical and experimental investigation), Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(10-11) (2009) 2040-2049.
[10]. S.J. Lee, S.E. Han, S.Y. Noh, S.-W. Shin, Deformation capacity of reduced beam section      moment connection by staggered holes, in:  International conference on sustainable building, Seoul, Korea, 2007.
[11]. T. Kim, A. Whittaker, A. Gilani, V. Bertero, S. Takhirov, Experimental evaluation of plate-reinforced steel moment-resisting connections, Journal of structural engineering, 128(4) (2002) 483-491.
[12].  S.J. Lee, S.E. Han, S.Y. Noh, S.-W. Shin, Deformation capacity of reduced beam section moment connection by staggered holes, in:  International conference on sustainable building, Seoul, Korea, 2007.
[13]. B. Stojadinović, S.C. Goel, K.-H. Lee, A.G. Margarian, J.-H. Choi, Parametric tests on unreinforced steel moment connections, Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(1) (2000) 40-49.
[14]. K.-C. Tsai, E.P. Popov, Steel beam-column joints in seismic moment resisting frames, University of California, Berkeley, 1988.
[15]. H. Krawinkler, E.P. Popov, V.V. Bertero, Shear behavior of steel frame joints, Journal of the Structural Division, 101(11) (1975) 2317-2336.
[16]. N. Fanaie, H.S. Moghadam, Experimental study of rigid connection of drilled beam to CFT column with external stiffeners, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 153 (2019) 209-221.
[17]. AISC 341-10. (2010). “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, Chicago (IL): American   Institute of Steel Construction.”
[18]. SAC. SAC/BD-97/02 Version 1.1, Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing, and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other specimens, Sacramento (CA): SAC Joint Venture, 1997.