“Friction-Transfer” Method to Assess the Compressive and Tensile Strengths and Rupture Modulus of Fiber-Reinforced-Pozzolanic Concrete and Mortar/Steel Adhesion

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

Nowadays, non-destructive tests are of great importance for evaluating the quality of concretes. However, such tests typically measure the relevant parameters indirectly, followed by estimating the strength of the concrete using several equations. Accordingly, the present study utilized the friction transfer method to directly evaluate the compressive and tensile strengths and the rupture modulus of glass and polypropylene fiber reinforced pozzolanic concretes at different ages. The in-situ test results were related to the strength of the fiber-reinforced pozzolanic concrete using linear and power regression analyses. Afterward, calibration curves were plotted to translate the friction transfer results into compressive and tensile strengths and the rupture modulus. To realize this objective, eight mixed designs with compressive strengths of 15-50 MPa were employed. In addition, the effects of the fibers on the adhesion of the mortar and steel were evaluated using the friction transfer test. ABAQUS was employed to model non-reinforced and fiber reinforced concrete specimens and the effects of fibers on the results. The results indicated high correlation coefficients between the experimental tests and friction transfer test results. The addition of fibers led to the improved compressive behavior of the concrete, reduced mortar shrinkage, and increased concrete-steel adhesion.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. ASTM C597-16. Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2016).
  2. ASTM C808/C805M-18. Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2018).
  3. ACI Committee 214, Report 214.4R-03. Guide for Obtaining Cores and Interpreting Compressive Strength Results, American Concrete Institute, (2003).
  4. ASTM C900-15. Standard Test Method for Pullout Strength of Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2015).
  5. Masi, A. Digrisolo, and G. Santarsieo, Experimental evaluation of drilling damage on the strength of cores extracted from RC buildings. In Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(7) (2013) 749-760.
  6. ASTM C1583, Standard test method for tensile strength of concrete surfaces and the bond strength or tensile strength of concrete repair and overlay materials by direct tension (pull-off method), West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2004).
  7. Pereira, and M.H.F. Medeiros, Pull off Test to Evaluate the Compressive Strength of Concrete: an Alternative to Brazilian Standard Techniques. Ibracon Structures and Materials Journal. 5(6) (2012) 757-780.
  8. Naderi, New Twist-Off Method for the Evaluation of In-Situ Strength of Concrete, Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 35(6) (2007) 27-38.
  9. Naderi, and R. Shibani, New Method for Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Strength. Australian Journal of Basic Applied Sciences. 7(2) (2013) 438-447.
  10. Shekarchi, A. Bonakdar, M. Bakhshi, A. Mirdamadi, and B. Mobasher, Transport properties in Metakaolin blended concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 24(3) (2010) 2217–2223.
  11. A. Gruber, T. Ramlochan, A. Boddy, R.D. Hooton, and M.D.A. Thomas, Increasing concrete durability with high-reactivity metakaolin, Cement and Concrete Research 23(6) (2001) 479-484.
  12. Batis, P. Pantazopoulou, S. Tsivilis, and E. Badogiannis, The effect of metakaolin on the corrosion behavior of cement mortars, Cement & Concrete Composites 27(4) (2005) 125–130.
  13. Ahmadi, H. Azizi, and M. Kouhi, Investigation of the effect of zeolite in different grades of cement on the strength and permeability of concrete, Concrete Research, 8(2) (2015) 5-18.
  14. Shakiba, P. Rahgozar, A.A. Elahi, and R. Rahgozar, Effect of activated pozzolan with Ca(OH)2 and nano-SiO2 on micro-structure and hydration of high-volume natural pozzolan paste. Civ. Eng. J., 4(10) (2018) 2437-2449.
  15. Pacheco-Torgal, and S. Jalali, Nanotechnology: advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials. Construction and building materials, 25(2) (2011) 582-590.
  16. P. Singh, S.R. Karade, S.K. Bhattacharyya, M.M. Yousuf, and S. Ahalawat, Beneficial role of nano-silica in cement based materials–A review. Construction and Building Materials, 47(3) (2013) 1069-1077.
  17. Naderi, Friction-Transfer Test for the Assessment of in-situ Strength & Adhesion of Cementitious Materials, Construction & Building Materials, 19(6) (2005) 454-459.
  18. Alsadey, and M. Salem, Influence of Polypropylene Fiber on Strength of Concrete. American Journal of Engineering Research. 5(7) (2016) 223-226.
  19. Alam, I, Ahmad, and F. Rehman, Experimental Study on Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology. 24(6) (2005) 297-301.
  20. ACI Committee 544, Report 544.1R-96. State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Concr. Int., ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 5, (2009).
  21. Naderi, An alternative method for in situ determination of rock strength, Can. Geotech. J. 48(5) (2011) 1901-1905.
  22. Naderi, Evaluating in situ shear strength of bituminous pavements, Proceedings of the institution of Civil Engineering, (2006) 61-65.
  23. Naderi, Adhesion of Different Concrete Repair Systems Exposed to Different Environments, The Journal of Adhesion, 84(1) (2008) 78-104.
  24. Naderi, and O. Ghodousian, Adhesion of Self-Compacting Overlays Applied to Different Concrete Substrates and Its Prediction by Fuzzy Logic, The Journal of Adhesion, 88(10) (2012) 848-865.
  25. Naderi, Analysis of the Slant Shear Test, The Journal of Adhesion and Technology, 23(2) (2012) 229-245.
  26. Naderi, Effects of Cyclic Loading, Freeze-Thaw and Temperature Changes on Shear Bond Strengths of Different Concrete Repair Systems, The Journal of Adhesion, 84(9) (2008) 743-763.
  27. ASTM C136-01, Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, American Society for Testing and Materials, (2001).
  28. ASTM C128, Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate, West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2015).
  29. ASTM C127, Standard test method for density, relative density (specific gravity), and absorption of fine aggregate, West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2012).
  30. Walid, L. Nordine, K. Abdelhafid, and N. Mohamed, Natural pozzolan addition effect on compressive strength and capillary water absorption of Mortar, International Conference On Materials And Energy, 16(3) (2016) 17-20.
  31. ASTM C143/C143M-12, Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2012).
  32. ASTM C231/C231M-10, Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method. West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2010).
  33. ASTM C293/C293M:16, Flexural strength of concrete using simple beam with center-point loading– Test method. West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2016).
  34. British Standard 1881-118. Methods of Testing concrete, Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes, British Standards Institution, London, (1983).
  35. ASTM 496/C496M, Standard test method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, West Conshohocken PA, American Society for Testing and Materials (2017).
  36. ACI Committee 318, Report 318R-14. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute, (2014).
  37. Kayedi, M. Sharifzadeh, and A. Kazemi, Examination of concrete microstructure containing polypropylene and quartz fibers by SEM, International congress on structure, Tabriz, Iran, (2014).
  38. Alnkaa, H. Yaprak, S. MEMİŞ, and G. Kaplan, Effect of Different Cure Conditions on the Shrinkage of Geopolymer Mortar.” International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 14(10) (2018) 51-55.
AUT Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4
December 2021
Pages 557-576

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics