Optimizing Dynamic Scheduling in Construction with BIM: A Framework for Budget-Constrained Resource Management

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16765-163, Narmak, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.Sc. Student, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16765-163, Narmak, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16765-163, Narmak, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Project scheduling is a fundamental part of construction management, as it controls activity timing, costs, ‎and resource allocation.Despite the available tools for planning a project, such an important role still ‎relies heavily on the schedulers experience and goes through many trial and error situations during the ‎project. This research develops a new framework for time and resource allocation optimization in a ‎project to further facilitate project planning. The framework also attempts to gather, store and process all ‎of the project’s data in order to achieve an accurate estimation. Building Information Modeling (BIM) ‎was used to store the necessary data and after defining the constraints, the model was transferred to ‎Simphony.NET via a Visual Basic (VB.NET) data-exchange module that queried and exported task ‎dependencies, resource limitations, and budget constraints stored in an MS Access database. The transfer ‎mechanism preserved the relational data schema (foreign keys linking tasks, resources, and costs), thereby ‎ensuring interoperability and preventing data loss. Finally, ant colony algorithm was used for ‎optimization. The outcome was compared to a real-life case study and the reliability of the algorithm was ‎validated. Results show that compared to the actual project duration of 108 days and the ‎contractor’s initial planned duration of 90 days, our model predicted 97 days. This reduced the ‎time estimation error from 16% (initial vs. actual) to 10% (model vs. actual). Furthermore, ‎relative to the actual project outcome, the optimized schedule achieved an 18% improvement in ‎project duration and a 13% reduction in total cost.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects