AUT Journal of Civil Engineering

AUT Journal of Civil Engineering

Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Tamper Weight and Drop Height on Dynamic Compaction of Landfills

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Ali Asghar Naemi 1
Mohammad Reza Atrechian 2
Mohammad Hossein Taghizadeh Valdi 3
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Mehr-Aeen Higher Education Institute, Bandar Anzali, Iran.
10.22060/ajce.2026.25199.5972
Abstract
The dynamic compaction method for soil improvement was introduced by Louis Menard in 1970. Numerical studies on dynamic compaction have predominantly been conducted on dry granular soils, with less consideration given to its application in municipal solid waste compaction. The present study aims to numerically investigate the effect of tamper weight and drop height on the dynamic compaction of landfills. This was done using the finite element software Abaqus 6.14-2 in two time steps, geostatic and explicit dynamic, using the coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. The study results demonstrate that increasing the drop height of a tamper with a weight of 5t from 5m to 30 m increases the depth of the cavity created in the soil from 12.6cm to 50cm, increases the stress developed in the soil from 747kg/m² to 4111kg/m², and increases the plastic strain from 0.16 to 1.3. Moreover, increasing the drop height for a tamper weight of 30 t from 5m to 30m increases the crater depth in the soil from 50cm to 2.73m, increases the soil stress from 4111kg/m² to 27176.5kg/m², and increases the plastic strain in the soil from 1.3 to 12.27. It can thus be summarized that although both the weight and the drop height of the tamper are effective in the momentum, the applied stresses, the crater depth, and the plastic strain of the landfill, the use of heavy tampers, which require high-capacity cranes, is not recommended for dynamic compaction in landfill improvement due to limitations in their use and increased project implementation costs.
Keywords
Dynamic compaction
landfills
tamper weight
drop height
crater depth
Subjects
[1] M.H. Taghizadeh Valdi, M.R. Atrechian, A. Jafary Shalkoohy, S.A. Hosseini, Experimental study of the effect of holes number and arrangement of lattice pounder on offshore dynamic compaction, Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 52(8) (2020) 1923-1934.
[2] Q. Gu, F.H. Lee, Landfill response to dynamic compaction. Journal of Geotechnique, 52(7) (2002) 481- 493.
[3] A. Oshima, N. Takada, Relation between compacted area and ram momentum by heavy tamping, Proceedings of 14th ICSMFE, 1994, pp. 1641–1644.
[4] A. Rouaiguia, R. Al-Zahrani, Simulation of soil dynamic compaction. The 6th Saudi Engineering Conference, 2002, pp. 223-232.
[5] R.G. Lukas, Dynamic compaction for highway construction, Volume 1: Design and Construction Guidelines, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA Report Rd‐86/133. 1986.
[6] S. Thevanayagam, G. Martin, R. Nashed, T. Shenthan, T. Kanagalingam, N. Ecemis, Liquefaction remediation in silty soils using dynamic compaction and stone columns, University of Buffalo Publishing, 2006, pp. 118.
[7] R. Hoosmandan, S.S. Yasrobi, A. Pak, Prediction of soil improvement in dynamic compaction operations by adjusting pounder penetration values, Modares Journal of Engineering, 28 (2007) 15-29.
[8] A. Pak, G. Jahangiri, Numerical Study of the effects of energy, momentum, and tamper radius and soil initial relative density on soil improvement by dynamic compaction, Proceedings of 5th National Congress on Civil Engineering, 2010, pp. 1-8.
[9] S. S. Eftekhari, S. Yasrobi, Landfill improvement by dynamic compaction using numerical modeling by finite difference method in dry sand, Modares Journal of Civil Engineering, 11(3) (2011) 55-65.
[10] M. Pourjenabi, A. Hamidi, Numerical modeling of dynamic compaction process in dry sands considering critical distance from adjacent structures, Journal of Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 56(1) (2015) 49-56.
[11] E. Ghanbari, A. Hamidi, Improvement parameters in dynamic compaction adjacent to the slopes, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 7 (2015) 233-236.
[12] S. Mehdipour, A. Hamidi, Impact of tamper shape on the efficiency and vibrations induced during dynamic compaction of dry sands by 3D finite element modeling, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 50(1) (2017) 151-163.
[13] W. Wang, J.J. Chen, J.H. Wang, Estimation method for landfill deformation of granular soils caused by dynamic compaction, Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92 (2017) 266–278.
[14] S. Kundu, B.V.S. Viswanadham, Use of Dynamic Compaction for Densifying MSW Landfills, In Transportation, Water and Environmental Geotechnics: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, 2020, pp. 159-169.
[15] R.I.A. Rathnayaka, S.A.S. Kulathilaka, Improvement of compressibility characteristics of waste material by dynamic compaction, 2021.
[16] C. Woods, R. Shaffer, S. Drumheller, Dynamic Compaction: A Proven Landfill Improvement Method for Landfill Sites, In Geo-Congress, 2023, pp. 311-321.
[17] M. Kim, Enhancing Landfill Improvement of Dredging Landfill in South Korea’s Western Coastal Region: Insights into Dynamic Compaction Characteristics, Buildings, 13(7) (2023) 1830.
[18] J. Du, Y. Zhang, S. Wu, Y. Dong, J. Shi, Experimental and Analytical Modeling of Ground Displacement Induced by Dynamic Compaction in Granular Soils. Buildings, 13(2) (2023) 539.
[19] M. Bayat, M. Saadat, A. Hojati, Optimization of dynamic compaction procedure for sandy soils, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 57(1) (2024) 145-156.
[20] C.N. Debeleac, A. Buraga, S.M. Nastac, Experimental and Numerical Study in Dynamic Compaction of Weakly-Cohesive Soils, Applied Sciences, 14(22) (2024) 10129.
[21] Y. Zhang, X. Chen, H. Ge, Z. Guo, X. Li, Influence of soil parameters on dynamic compaction: numerical analysis and predictive modeling using GA-optimized BP neural networks, Frontiers in Materials, 12 (2025) 1631816.
[22] W. Chao, Y. Niu, S. Zhang, B. Gong, Numerical Simulation of Loess Foundation Behaviour Under High-Energy Dynamic Compaction Based on Experimental Data, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 62(5) (2025) 515-522.
[23] S.L. Machado, M.F. Carvalho, O.M. Vilar, Constitutive model for municipal solid waste, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128(11) (2002) 940-951.
[24] K.R. Reddy, H. Hettiarachchi, J. Gangathulasi, J.E. Bogner, Geotechnical properties of municipal solid waste at different phases of biodegradation, Waste Management, 31(11) (2011) 2275-2286.
[25] W. Powrie, and R.P. Beaven, Hydraulic properties of household waste and implifications for landfills, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 137(4) (1999) 235-247.
[26] H.S. Thilakasiri, M. Gunaratne, G. Mullins, P. Stinnette, C. Kuo, Implementation aid for dynamic replacement of organic soils with sand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(1) (2001).
[27] A. Pak, H. Shahir, A. Ghassemi. Behavior of dry and saturated soils under impact load during dynamic compaction, Proceedings of the 16th ICSMGE, 2005, pp. 1245-1248.
[28] F.L. Dimaggio, I.S. Sandler, Material model for granular soils, Journal of Engineering Mech. 97 (1971).
[29] C.J. Poran, J. Rodriguez, A finite element analysis of impact behavior of sand, Journal of Soils and Foundations, 32(4) (1992) 68-80.
[30] J.L. Pan, A.R. Selby, Simulation of dynamic compaction of loose granular soil, Journal of Advances in Engineering Software, 33 (2002) 631-640.
[31] E. Ghanbari, A. Hamidi, Numerical modeling of rapid impact compaction in loose sands, Journal of Geomechanics and Engineering, 6(5) (2014) 487-502.
[32] A. Ghassemi, A. Pak, H. Shahir, A numerical tool for design of dynamic compaction treatment in dry and moist sands, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, 33(B4) (2009) 313-326.
AUT Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 2
Spring 2026
Pages 131-142