A Finite Element Analysis of Slab Opening Effects on the Column Removal Scenarios in Large Buildings

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Qazvin branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Qazvin branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Rigid diaphragms play an important role in structural integrity against progressive collapse scenarios. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of floor slab details on progressive collapse resistance. The main intention of this paper is to investigate the behavior of medium-raised steel buildings with various slab opening conditions in progressive collapse. Numerical studies were carried out by considering different locations and dimensions of the slab openings using the ABAQUS FE software. The highlight of this work is to utilize a nonlinear dynamic analysis to survey the diaphragm condition in load redistribution for column removal scenarios. The axial force variations of columns and diaphragm displacements are compared for different slab opening sizes and locations. The validity of the finite element method is examined using the moment rotation results of an experimental program conducted on a 3D frame covered by a reinforced concrete slab. Generally, the openings placed in the middle and the corner of the structure govern a different after-shock behavior on the structure. In contrast to the middle openings, the corner openings lead to negative effects on the load-resisting capacity of the structure. Moreover, the vulnerability of the columns placed in the vicinity of the corner openings is more than the column around the middle openings. The effect of the opening dimension depends on the opening location.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. S.o.C. Engineers, Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, in, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017.
  2. L. Solnick, Stealing the state: control and collapse in Soviet institutions, Harvard University Press, 1998.
  3. Bachmann, S.O.f.d. L'environnement, Seismic conceptual design of buildings: basic principles for engineers, architects, building owners, and authorities, SDC, 2003.
  4. Ranjbar, A.; Available from: bigbangpage.com/science-content/
  5. T. Szyniszewski, Progressive collapse of moment resisting steel framed buildings quantitative analysis based energy approach, University of Florida, 2008.
  6. Astaneh-Asl, E.A. Madsen, C. Noble, R. Jung, D.B. McCallen, M.S. Hoehler, W. Li, R. Hwa, Use of catenary cables to prevent progressive collapse of buildings, Report No.: UCB/CEE-STEEL-2001/02, (2001).
  7. Kaewkulchai, E.B. Williamson, Beam element formulation and solution procedure for dynamic progressive collapse analysis, Computers & Structures, 82(7-8) (2004) 639-651.
  8. Powell, Progressive collapse: Case studies using nonlinear analysis, in: Structures Congress 2005: Metropolis and Beyond, 2005, pp. 1-14.
  9. Khandelwal, S. El-Tawil, F. Sadek, Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(3) (2009) 699-708.
  10. Tsitos, G. Mosqueda, A. Filiatrault, A.M. Reinhorn, Experimental investigation of progressive collapse of steel frames under multi-hazard extreme loading, in: Proceedings of The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2008.
  11. Fu, Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(6) (2009) 1269-1278.
  12. Tavakoli, M.M. Afrapoli, Robustness analysis of steel structures with various lateral load resisting systems under the seismic progressive collapse, Engineering Failure Analysis, 83 (2018) 88-101.
  13. Amiri, H. Saffari, J. Mashhadi, Assessment of dynamic increase factor for progressive collapse analysis of RC structures, Engineering Failure Analysis, 84 (2018) 300-310.
  14. Li, W. Wang, Y. Chen, L.H. Teh, A basis for comparing progressive collapse resistance of moment frames and connections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 139 (2017) 1-5.
  15. Weng, C.K. Lee, K.H. Tan, N.S. Lim, Damage assessment for reinforced concrete frames subject to progressive collapse, Engineering Structures, 149 (2017) 147-160.
  16. Jiang, G.-Q. Li, L. Li, B. Izzuddin, Simulations on progressive collapse resistance of steel moment frames under localized fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 138 (2017) 380-388.
  17. Yang, Y. Yang, X.-H. Zhou, Q.-F. Jiang, S.-B. Kang, Component tests and numerical simulations of composite floor systems under progressive collapse, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 151 (2018) 25-40.
  18. -C. Lin, B. Yang, S.-B. Kang, S.-Q. Xu, A new method for progressive collapse analysis of steel frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 153 (2019) 71-84.
  19. Fu, K.-H. Tan, Numerical study on steel-concrete composite floor systems under corner column removal scenario, in: Structures, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 33-44.
  20. Bredean, M. Botez, The influence of beams design and the slabs effect on the progressive collapse resisting mechanisms development for RC framed structures, Engineering Failure Analysis, 91 (2018) 527-542.
  21. N. Fu, K.H. Tan, X.H. Zhou, B. Yang, Numerical simulations on three-dimensional composite structural systems against progressive collapse, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 135 (2017) 125-136.
  22. Lu, K. Lin, Y. Li, H. Guan, P. Ren, Y. Zhou, Experimental investigation of RC beam-slab substructures against progressive collapse subject to an edge-column-removal scenario, Engineering Structures, 149 (2017) 91-103.
  23. Peng, S.L. Orton, J. Liu, Y. Tian, Experimental study of dynamic progressive collapse in flat-plate buildings subjected to an interior column removal, Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(8) (2018) 04018094.
  24. T. Pham, N.S. Lim, K.H. Tan, Investigations of tensile membrane action in beam-slab systems under progressive collapse subject to different loading configurations and boundary conditions, Engineering Structures, 150 (2017) 520-536.
  25. Sideri, C.L. Mullen, S. Gerasimidis, G. Deodatis, Distributed column damage effect on progressive collapse vulnerability in steel buildings exposed to an external blast event, Journal of Performance of constructed Facilities, 31(5) (2017) 04017077.
  26. Panahi, S.M. Zahrai, Performance of typical plan concrete buildings under progressive collapse, in: Structures, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 1163-1172.
  27. Praxedes, X.-X. Yuan, Robustness Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Frames under Progressive Collapse Hazards: Novel Risk-Based Framework, Journal of Structural Engineering, 147(8) (2021) 04021119.
  28. Peng, C. Hou, L. Shen, Progressive collapse analysis of corner-supported composite modular buildings, Journal of Building Engineering, 48 (2022) 103977.
  29. -C. Hu, Y.-H. Tan, F. Xi, Failure assessment and virtual scenario reproduction of the progressive collapse of the FIU bridge, Engineering Structures, 227 (2021) 111423.
  30. Mucedero, E. Brunesi, F. Parisi, Progressive collapse resistance of framed buildings with partially encased composite beams, Journal of Building Engineering, 38 (2021) 102228.
  31. -T. Thai, Q.V. Ho, W. Li, T. Ngo, Progressive collapse and robustness of modular high-rise buildings, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, (2021) 1-13.
  32. McKay, K. Marchand, M. Diaz, Alternate path method in progressive collapse analysis: Variation of dynamic and nonlinear load increase factors, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 17(4) (2012) 152-160.
  33. Systèmes, Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, 2016, Dassault Systèmes: Vélizy-Villacoublay, France, (2016).
  34. ABAQUS Inc., ABAQUS 6.5 Analysis User’s Manual, in, SIMULIA, 2004.
  35. 360-05, Specification for structural steel buildings, in, American Institute of Steel Construction Chicago, IL, USA, 2005.
  36. Habibullah, ETABS users’ manual, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, USA, (1992).
  37. -F. Wang, G.-Q. Li, Testing of semi-rigid steel–concrete composite frames subjected to vertical loads, Engineering Structures, 29(8) (2007) 1903-1916.